Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dean Dumont who wrote (207)	8/17/1998 9:07:00 AM
From: bmart	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

Mr. bgtit, RMIL shareholders understand that Mr. Zapara and Mr. Mork work together in a carefully orchestrated manner. For those still attempting to permanantly halt RMIL, Mr. Zapara is their 'fall guy'. The story goes that Mr. Zapara was hired to promote OVIS (RMIL). He was compensated in shares to promote OVIS. He informed Mr. Mork that OVIS was a "pig" and instructed Mr. Mork to short OVIS using his shares to cover the short if deemed necessary . OVIS was targeted as a terminal short before Morgan & Breton took over management. With Morgan & Breton, the stock went from $.20 to $4.26. Mr. Zapara sold the shares that were to cover Mr. Mork's short position.Mr. Mork contacted all regulatory agencies in the hope of a terminal halt. Getting a halt was not difficult, prior management was horrific. According to Mr. Mork, Mr. Zapara struck a deal with Messrs. Morgan & Breton, Mr. Zapara was to split up the shares he recieved for promoting OVIS with Messrs. Breton & Morgan. The shares never left the TA. There was a 40 day holding period in which time the OVIS BOD was to write a resolution on behalf of those shares. The problems with this story is that RMIL lawyers have sworn affadavits from Mr. Zapara stating differently. The TA also confirms the float at 14+MM shares, not 17+MM that was reported here. Currently RMIL financials are being audited. If the RMIL financials contained 3MM+ extra shares, what auditor would touch those financials? Mr. Riley G acts pro se in Mr. Mork's civil suit against RMIL. He is afforded all court documents. From these documents we can ascertain that Mr. Mork has not covered his short position in RMIL. We also no of Mr. Zapara's sworn testimony that negates his/Mork's tale of splitting-up 5MM shares and there being an extra 3MM shares in the float at RMIL. Mr. bgtit, I suggest to you that this is why the AZNT thread will feel the presence of Messrs. Martin, Reece & tonto, because even with a huge smear campaign and tremendous amounts of misinformation, they still have not obtained the terminal short at RMIL they desire. I know, after to speaking to Mr. Breton of RMIL, that he has discussed Mr. Zapara with Mr. Sylver of AZNT. Zapara's accounts are frozen, he faces litigation at RMIL & AZNT, and other than that, is not a factor , any longer, in the AZNT market. Having said that, hopefully for the very last time,I hope we can focus on AZNT. Good Day RB

To: Dean Dumont who wrote (207)	8/17/1998 10:54:00 AM
From: s martin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

Bgtit You obviously don't read this thread carefully. It is BMart who is promoting the Zapara connection with AZNT. AZNT certainly seems to be having a problem with the short squeeze which you and others have been promoting lo these many weeks.. when do you expect that to take place? Since you seem to be fully informed about company doings, perhaps you could elaborate on what stores are currently selling the products. You say there are many orders coming into the web site.. what is the source of those customers.. what advertising?