SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rob S. who wrote (13796)8/17/1998 1:04:00 PM
From: Cyclops  Respond to of 164684
 
Rob,

What is meant by the phrase "boxing." Does that mean
get yourself into a box at the end of the day when the
shorts try to cover by day end and the stock shoot up?

Correct me if "boxing" is meant otherwise.

Regards,

Cyclops



To: Rob S. who wrote (13796)8/17/1998 1:24:00 PM
From: zax  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
REQUIRED READING
****************


rcmfinancial.com

I hope a huge inet and "darling" selloff, if it does come soon, doesn't hurt the overall market too much. I'd hate to see worthy stocks suffer for the crazes of the masses.

Unfortunately, this doesn't appear to be how the market behaves in general.

I'm hopeful what we are seeing overall is an intelligent re-alignment of capital overall towards the smaller caps and that all of these momos just get the crap kicked out of them. I'm an optimist that the markets work correctly and as intended in the end. Perhaps this is wrong, but I'm putting my money that way. I know this may sound ridiculous, in light of commonly prevailing theory that the market is driven purely by greed and fear, but I happen to believe that socially responsible investing is important. I was teased last time I said this, but heck... I'm just gonna speak my mind anyway. I'm ready to be flamed... hasn't happened at least for a week.

May market rationality prevail in the end, and may the creme rise to the top.

Regards,

-- Zaxbowow



To: Rob S. who wrote (13796)8/17/1998 3:36:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Moving towards below 119, r/t 118 15/16..

targets?