Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: alan w who wrote (2118)	8/19/1998 8:28:00 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Respond to of 13994

Oh commercial thank GOD no need fer Gravol any more...

To: alan w who wrote (2118)	8/19/1998 10:00:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Read the post a little more carefully before you rant and rave pal.Perhaps you might want to read the post I was responding to .My reference to freeloaders referred to any one paying no tax.Under the Forbes plan anyone making$32000 would pay no tax.Now tell me do you think that anyone living in America and enjoying the safety that our defence provides,the benefits of our higher education system or any of the benefits that our tax dollars pay for should not also contribute?It matters not how hard one works for his or her money if they do not pay for services that they use thus allowing others to pay for them they are freeloaders in my opinion.Try this, if you make $50000 and pay tax that supports a military that defends the country and I earn $32000 thus[under the Forbes plan] pay no tax yet live under the defensive umbrella that your tax dollars paid for am I not a freeloader?If you disagree and choose to respond with argument rather than emotion I'll be glad to hear from you. pez