Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LesX who wrote (131)	8/20/1998 12:35:00 AM
From: DADDY WARBUCKS	Respond to of 67261

To all: I certainly don't agree with what the President has done. The really bad thing is that he has lied. He knows the definition of sex and purposely lied. BUT, he is our Commander-in-Chief and we elected him. Whether you voted for him or not, he is still our President. Either stand behind him and support him, or impeach him. That is how our country was established. If you don't like something, do something about it. A person who does nothing but talk about what others should do is a horrible creature that is reaping the benefits of others efforts. I personally don't think that he should be impeached. I think he has done the job that we elected him to do. He can't be re-elected and he hasn't messed with our great economy that was so masterfully put in motion by Bush and his "VooDoo" economics. Well, that is my two cents. If you don't like it that is O.K. In the infamous words of Shoot1st, "boogers on you". Daddy

To: LesX who wrote (131)	8/20/1998 1:12:00 AM
From: wallacestevens	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I never voted for Bill Clinton, and I believe his behavior regarding MS Lewinsky was tacky. But the Republican wingbat attach machine has been horrific. I am much more afraid of self-righteous, holier-than-thou driving need these people have to judge and control the goodness quotient of other people. Instead of spending their efforts trying to be or do good, they hold themselves out as the morality police. As I said, I didn't vote for Clinton. But even today, knowing what I do about him, I would vote for him before I'd vote for any Republican (except Olympia Snow). But the point of this thread is to make a sanity check. Does anyone else think it's insane that we have let this get so out of hand that the right wing actually thinks they have the right to get rid of an elected president because they don't like his "morals"? If they really cared about morals that much, they would object to Starr, who was counsel to the tobacco company ceos when they testified UNDER OATH that tobacco was not addictive. And that is just one example of perfidy among the right wing.