Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IanBruce who wrote (62837)	8/20/1998 4:16:00 AM
From: Gary Ng	Respond to of 186894

IanBruce, Re: Intel's patent on Merced If you truely believe what you said or claimed, Why not buy the Exponential patents and when Merced is out, sue Intel and make a little fortune ? Gary

To: IanBruce who wrote (62837)	8/20/1998 7:24:00 AM
From: Dave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ian: Good points, until here. I'm sure they do (two of them appear to be yours). But if their filing date is subsequent to Exponential's filing, they're simply worthless. Patent Law 101. If they're supersceded by prior art, they're revoked. That's the point. The U.S. is not first to file, but first to invent. dave

To: IanBruce who wrote (62837)	8/20/1998 10:40:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ian - DRivel and "Exponential patents can theoretically supersede Intel's patents..." You keep posting this same re-quote ! WHAT PATENTS ARE your talking about? What Exponential patent is violated by the Merced Design? You just keep blowing the same hot air baloney. Well, keep blowing it - it's all drivel. The only specifics that you posted - Intel using BIPOLAR technology - have been 100% ABSOLUTELY IDIOTIC WRONG. And everything else is HOT AIR HOGWASH. Paul