SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Randy McWilliams who wrote (23152)8/20/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: jach  Respond to of 70976
 
<<SEMICONDUCTOR STOCKS AND TOM KURLAK. It is also interesting that he would make the
downgrades a day after the SOX index plunged. If he had made these downgrades into
a rising market, he might have been seen as stubbornly trying to talk the market down.
Today, these downgrades will have greater credibility.>>

once again, the follow-the-herds are really great, after the facts when SOX index plunged; 'any one with a reasonable brain can do this half-awake', a comment heard from a friend-



To: Randy McWilliams who wrote (23152)8/20/1998 11:24:00 AM
From: jach  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
AMAT analysis:

a few days ago was 34+, now at 31+, what's the difference, no fundamentals changed except some SEMIs had announced poor performances, but was already a known factor in those sectors.
In the fast-paced semi world, it's now actually taking less time to move to the next curve and chip makers will need to upgrade their equipments if they want to be in the mkt. Wil their full range of prducts and the new technology AMAT will benefit greatly.
The time to seriously look into is when most of these great analysts are downgrading, ever see many downgrades when a stock is at their all time highs, what were most alaysts saying when amat at their all time highs, "strong buy"; even more pathetic is that some will initiate with "hold", grandma said "don't say anything if you've nothing to say", why bother?



To: Randy McWilliams who wrote (23152)8/20/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: Karin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
Mr. Kurlak is probably trading INTEL. He needs to get the price down, so he can repurchase it. He is surely picking a lot on INTEL.