Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (63005)	8/21/1998 1:14:00 PM
From: Night Trader	Respond to of 186894

Well there are other analysts: biz.yahoo.com

To: Elmer who wrote (63005)	8/21/1998 1:31:00 PM
From: TTOSBT	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "Then it follows that you are admitting that the real issue with Thomas and Packwood was politics as well, as if that weren't obvious at the time." How could I ever take anyone serious who uses the word "admitting" to a person who is not on trial or committed any crime? You no doubt have the same demeanor as your hero Starr. Both Thomas and Packwood were offending their accusers, Monica Lewinsky did not take offense to Clinton's acts only outsiders did. Thomas was the top govermental official for sexual harrassment at the time of his accused offense! Put thinks in perspective before you start your persecution! TTOSBT

To: Elmer who wrote (63005)	8/21/1998 2:15:00 PM
From: Len Roselli	Respond to of 186894

Elmer, Re: "The best thing to come out of all this is that the left has forfeited their pretense of ethical highground." And where do you get the idea that the left ever had any pretense to the highround? It seems to me that the left has always been more pragmatic and the right more doctrinaire, not even counting the religious right. I think you got your concepts mixed-up. Len