SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joseph Beltran who wrote (5747)8/21/1998 2:22:00 PM
From: Robert Douglas  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9980
 
Joseph, you wrote:

I think Greenspan has to concede now that the threat of a recession is much larger than the threat of inflation.

I doubt seriously that Mr. Greenspan is conceding that at all - especially in light of two economic releases this week showing housing starts at a 10-year high and the 4-week average of jobless claims as low as it has been in a year.

We are in a deflationary spiral here and the only cure that I'm aware of is to print and print more money.

I see little evidence of deflation here (United States) let alone a "deflationary spiral" What evidence do you see of such a spiral? I do however see mounting evidence of brewing inflation in such things as wages, housing and health care. Have you seen that HMOs are getting their first price increases in years from employers, some of which are in the 5% to 10% range?

The IMF should immediately relax the deficit constraints in s.k. and get money into circulation. even more important for japan to do so.

Here I agree. It's time for Keynesian stimulus in Asia. It isn't however in Mr. Greenspan's job description to provide liquidity for foreign nations. I think if the choice presents itself between inflationary pressures at home and a crisis in Asia, Greenspan will hold the tough line and fight inflation at home. I know that IS in his job description.

-Robert



To: Joseph Beltran who wrote (5747)8/21/1998 2:24:00 PM
From: Mike McFarland  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9980
 
We are in a deflationary spiral here and the only cure
that I'm aware of is to print and print more money. That
goes for the u.s. as well as all of asia.


I was not aware that money was tight here in the US--has
lending in the US become too restrictive? Are corporations
having trouble getting access to funds? Not at all. And
neither is money tight for the consumer, or at least you
would not know money was tight from the deals that are
available on mortgage and auto loans. Although I suppose
personal credit card interest rates are quite high, but
with many Americans tapped out on their cards you probably
wouldn't want to stimulate borrowing in that area by getting
those rates down (certainly, the banks have not exactly been
rushing to lower their card rates, even as the long bond rate
sinks to 5.4% today). No, I think there is quite enough money
sloshing about here in the US. Let the Asians buy their own
products for a change, we have sopped up enough of their cheap
exports through now.

As far as Asia, doesn't look like the Japanese consumer will
be able to buy Asia out of it's depression either. This is
quite a fix...looking forward to the next issues of the Economist.
(except I'm such a cheap bastard I share a subscription, and
they're always a week or two old when I get them).



To: Joseph Beltran who wrote (5747)8/21/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: Joseph G.  Respond to of 9980
 
<< I think Greenspan has to concede now that the threat of a recession is much larger than the
threat of inflation. We are in a deflationary spiral here and the only cure that I'm aware of is
to print and print more money. That goes for the u.s. as well as all of asia. The IMF should
immediately relax the deficit constraints in s.k. and get money into circulation. even more
important for japan to do so. >>

Why stop there? I think US treasury just should issue a guaranty of 36% per year to all stock holders who risk their health by sitting all day on sofas and dreaming of retirement at 39. They risk their hard earned $10k to get rich fast - should not the Government do something to reward them? Why not? Why work if The Govenrment can just print money and give it to deserving citizens?