Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (2499)	8/21/1998 4:36:00 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

That question had the sound of a Social Studies or History major/teacher, right?...a pop quiz.....o.k. I'll get out the books and see when the two-party system finally evolved.....probably some technicality involved here. Give me time, I'll do my homework, teach, and get back to you:o) Ann

To: Bill who wrote (2499)	8/21/1998 5:47:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

>> <<In any case, I believe the two-party system was inaugurated by the founding fathers with an eye to stability. If we waiver from their blueprint, it could be the undoing of their grand plan.>> > And, tell me, which two parties did the founding fathers inaugurate in their grand plan? Indeed, please tell me where the founding fathers talked about two parties at all? My history studies are decades behind me, but I could swear that there were more than two parties from the beginning.