Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LesX who wrote (409)	8/22/1998 1:23:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 67261

thank you. occasionally I have a lucid moment. :-) <eom>

To: LesX who wrote (409)	8/22/1998 9:32:00 AM
From: David C. Burns	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Here's a couple of Sanity Checks. salonmagazine.com salonmagazine.com

To: LesX who wrote (409)	8/22/1998 1:35:00 PM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<I think the authority is there to assist and encourage, as long as the ways aren't oppressive and unreasonable>> If the methods used were agreed to by the Congress, or only included words, I would agree. Otherwise, even though I may agree with the results, I still don't see where the feds get the authority to act. It's up to us to have our representatives grant additional power to the feds (st the state congressional level, not the federal congress) to the federal government, if we decide that's what we want.