To: stockroach who wrote (11815 ) 8/23/1998 10:44:00 AM From: mark doubiago Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
This is exactly what S3 should have done last year when they dropped the ball and treated us to 3, 4, 5, ... bad quarters. At least now things are looking up for the better. I would guess that it would take a bit for ATI to integrate an acquisition's chip into their products, which would give S3 that much more time to regain some territory. What an idea, S3 and ATI merging. They would probably sew up 50 - 60% of the graphics market and cause a lot of the other companies to drop out or merge with the new powerhouse. This would also save the two companies a possible pattern of leapfrog that they may be starting. On the topic of Savage and the new IBM, I hope that it is the base chip, not an option, that is if it is really there at all. I have read several reports (rumors) about IBM and S3. Someone reported that IBM dropped an order for the newest Trio3D from S3 and that maybe the reason why was to get the Savage instead. If the new IBM has the Savage, I would be interested in how long they have had it around and had worked with S3. This might hint at a much stronger relationship between S3 and IBM, which would probably mean that ATI would suffer some lost business (I believe that ATI was in quite a few IBMs last year). A few wins as the base chip for IBM, Compaq, or Dell, and this company and stock is back. Greg, sorry to not get back to you with the date, I was on a mini vacation to Maine for the weekend. If machines with the Savage start shipping in September, will we see an earnings surprise for the quarter? The financial statements always say that business tends to be backend loaded to the last month of the quarter which is September.