To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (3465 ) 8/24/1998 12:22:00 PM From: Zeev Hed Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5504
Ed, re: BTW, did you see that HEC's short interest only increased something like 300 K shares from 7/16 to 8/15? This was the very time period that our buddy the Z-man was putting out daily posts that conjured up images of massive shorting by the floorless securities holders. The fact that HEC short interest did not even increase by a day's average volume during that time pretty much closes the book on the Z-man's credibility IMO. Few comments, these reports just show the position at these two dates, one cannot find out, unfortunately what happens between these dates (and I do not understand why there could not be a daily report of the short position, with today electronics, why not, just that advantage that specialists have). I have presented data for HEC S-3, which points to the variable convertibility of three financial instruments amounting to $135 MM. I have also pointed to historical evidence that such floorless instruments in other cases have caused major dilution of current stockholders. Unless these were lies, I do not see what gives you the right to impune my credibility. You may question my conclusions, and you might even be right, but I have presented facts and the logical conclusion that such facts, in more than 90% of all cases, bring about. I think that an investor in HEC should always balance its financial structure against the "huge" potential indicated by Strain and even the company (which in my opinion is nothing short of hyping their own stock, when they say 8 billion BOE potential, you must read very carefully between the lines that this is a high hope not a fact). Zeev