Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j_b who wrote (2852)	8/24/1998 11:13:00 AM
From: P.T.Burnem	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

I don't believe anyone has said that the site housed completely, or even partially completed bombs or warheads, only chemicals, that when combined, could make nerve gas. The builders or plant managers could be telling the truth, and the US might still be justified in making the strike. Assuming that the Sudanese factory did indeed make "a nerve gas component", there must exist a factory that uses the component to manufacture the nerve gas. Right? How do we justify hitting the former, and leaving the latter up and running? Why doesn't the US put pressure on the country that houses this terrorist nerve gas plant to close it down? Why do we allow a notorious terrorist like bin Laden to continue manufacturing a deadly nerve gas that he has stated will be used against American women and children? Does this make any sense to you? PTB