SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Jackson who wrote (63208)8/24/1998 11:06:00 AM
From: Gary Ng  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Bill, Re: This Celeron will easily defeat all but the fastest Pentium IIs (400 Mhz up)

Go to Intel's WEB and check the official performance figure.

Gary



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (63208)8/24/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Bill, Re: "This Celeron will easily defeat all but the fastest Pentium IIs (400
Mhz up)"

That is wrong. As Gary says, check the benchmarks.

Celeron benchmarks: intel.com
Click on the highlighted titles, such as SYSmark*32 for Windows 95.

Pentium II benchmarks: intel.com
Click on Performance on the left and then on the highlighted titles, such as SYSmark*32 for Windows 95.

Pentium II 333 MHz is still in front of Celeron 333 MHz. Of course the spread gets greater when you look at PII 350, 400 and, 450 MHz vs. the Celerons. And, the new Celerons are a good 28 to 48% faster than the old Celerons, depending on clock frequency and what you run. The bar graphs tell the story. Look at them. I wonder where AMD's performance numbers will fall in?

Tony