To: getgo234 who wrote (14547 ) 8/25/1998 9:26:00 AM From: Jock Hutchinson Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 25814
LSI hasn't lost a dime yet, so I would think that $.50 a share loss for '99 is a little bit premature. But your key word is recession. There have been a variety of problems that have beset the semiconductor industry, which in turn have effected LSI. Two of these, inventory correction and the maintenance of high inventory are past LSI. The next problem--overcapacity, which has plagued the industry is somewhat past, but in the case of LSI it is now a significant problem because of Gresham, which will currently add excess capacity. But would you prefer not to have Gresham? No way. LSI is on the verge of realizing major returns from its high R&D. Standard cell based products such as DVD, DCAM, Fibre Channel, Wintel servers, and high end Networking and Communications all dictate that LSI have greater cutting edge capacity. As recently as last quarter, LSI was running at 90% capacity. To not have Gresham would be suicidal. The downturn is also a round world in the sense that further disinvestment into chip making equipment will only provide for greater profits at the boom stage of the cycle, which length will most likely have a direct correlation to the length of the current downturn. However, we now see clear signs of an overall deteriorating economy in the US--especially with those US customers who are supplying Asia. This can only have a synergistic effect on the overall US economy, which I believe is further weakened by our diminished Presidency. (I don't think that it is merely a coincidence that terrorist attacks on the US come at a time when Clinton is involved in domestic problems.) Thus, there is no doubt that the semi industry could continue to see a downturn because the current downturn has happened despite a strong overall economy. If the economy tanks, then there will be further deterioration in the semi industry. Ominously, this is precisely what the most recent LSI warning is telling us. If the downturn is in networking, you can be darn sure that a very good short-term play is buying puts in the major networking stocks the day before their next respective earnings announcements. Another thought, which I have never seen posted on this board is the effect Y2K has on the rate of investment in our infrastructure. Specifically, I am wondering if the lesser growth rates LSI is experiencing in networking and communications are not somehow related to corporations opting to allocate funds to Y2K rather than to areas such as networking and communications. So where does this leave LSI. The worse case scenario says we are 3/4s way through the downturn in the worst semicycle in its history with the reminder that the market always anticipates. LSI's price is at an historic low relative to book value and sales. You tell me what the price parameters are on LSI for the next two years. Two months ago, I felt that it would be 19 to high 50s. Clearly I was wrong. Today, I would venture 12 to high 50s. It was a superior long-term investment two months ago. It still is today.