SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pezz who wrote (742)8/26/1998 12:39:00 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
If Star has something other than Monica gate ,that is ,White water or any of the serious crimes that he was suppose to look in to I will indeed admit I was wrong and that he should go.

Absolutely I agree. But if all there is in his report is a consentual affair, then to quote a friend on the Dell thread, " I hope he is confined in a bedroom in hell and forced to have perpetual strenuous intimacies with Linda Tripp.".

A family was severely rocked over this, we have lost a pretty good president, and a 21 year old girls life is totally ruined. This BETTER BE about more than a consentual affair.



To: pezz who wrote (742)8/26/1998 1:05:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Okay Pezz, this one is for both you and Michelle: I ask you to consider the following question with sincere honesty and utter forthrightness:

When President Clinton lied in the deposition taken in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case, do you think that when he decided to not disclose the truth, his primary motivation may have dwelt More on which of the following two things (for the purposes of this quiz question, you must pick one of the two choices - pick the one you think is more correct than the other):

A) The traumatic emotional effects on his wife, daughter, and his personal relationship with them if/when a truthful deposition were made public.

or

B) Did he fear the credibility such an admission would lend to Paula Jones' legal charge that Bill Clinton sexually harassed her in an Arkansas hotel room, which just might eventually help Paula Jones win an eventual guilty verdict against Clinton in a jury trial, with all the attendant bad publicity and public condemnation he would be under for being a convicted sexual harasser.

I have no doubt in my mind that Bill Clinton, accomplished politician, was thinking primarily of his own selfish political needs and NOT the needs of his wife and daughter, when he lied under a sworn oath to tell the truth. Indeed, Bill Clinton has already admitted while he was President that he as done things which have "hurt his marriage".

There were no traumatic long-term effects on his marriage for that admission, and indeed Hillary was the most loyal, care-free, and trusting wife one could imagine after the Monica story broke.

So in my very honest and sincere opinion, Clinton did Not lie about sex, but rather to save his figurative political ass from the effects of a sexual harassment conviction.

That's My Story, and I am sticking to it, also.



To: pezz who wrote (742)8/26/1998 3:12:00 AM
From: RJC2006  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Gotta laugh though. The President allegedly masturbates himself and then goes out and shakes the hand of a terrorist. Now that's a smart move!