Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (770)	8/26/1998 9:18:00 AM
From: wallacestevens	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Dwight, you've made a point I agree with. . . .I told an adamant Clinton supporter that I was personally almost postitive that BC was lying, and that BC was playing a dangerous game. . . . I find this fingerwagging statement of the President's more offensive to me as a citizen than the most sordid detail of his PERSONAL relationship with la Monica. The fingerwagging statement was a public act and the most nearly direct lie Mr. Clinton has told me, as a citizen, about this whole Monica deal. I say "nearly direct lie" because it still fits the dissembling category rather than the blatant lie category. Why? Because I believe -- and this is just my belief -- that Clinton thought that it "didn't count" as sex if he (excuse the graphic language, gentlefolk) didn't stick it in. But it counts, Mr. President, (it's like tiddlywinks and horseshoes?) and I feel lied to there. Do I want Clinton out of office for this? No. Will I never believe anything he says? Yes. Do I think the Repubican attack dogs have behaved more repulsively and are more dangerous to the country than this silly, tacky behavior of Clinton? Yes.