Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wallacestevens who wrote (771)	8/26/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: halfscot	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

I really only have one problem with what you've said in this post: Do I think the Repubican attack dogs have behaved more repulsively and are more dangerous to the country than this silly, tacky behavior of Clinton? Yes. All in all I think most would agree the Republicans, for the most part, have been rather restrained in their 'attacking' of the president. Now, I'm talking about the legislators and not the talking head attack dogs who's numbers are at least equalled by the Democrat attack dogs against Starr et. al. The usually liberal media have also begun to turn on Clinton as well. The Republicans are awaiting the Starr report where it is suspected much more will be revealed other than the Lewinsky scandal that may lead to impeachment hearings. I don't think for a minute the Republicans want to pursue impeachment if they only have the Lewinsky matter, as repulsive as it is, with which to proceed. halfscot