Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : What-Are-My-Motives WAMM THREAD - HIDDEN AGENDA'S ON SI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (333)	8/26/1998 9:59:00 PM
From: Cavalry	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 407

thanks kerry didnt save pm inre to receipt of services please repost that for me and i will post the second Private Message To: Cavalry (who wrote...) From: Kerry J. Carmichael Wednesday, Aug 26 1998 9:47PM ET Cavalry, I saw your second question. The answer depends upon whether or not you're talking a civil lawsuit or a criminal proceeding. Either way, if the defendant has fled to another country (doesn't matter where), s/he can be a defendant in abstensia. This means the legal proceedings continue without the defendant being present. In a civil proceeding, the absent defendant will almost always lose by default (no defense presented to the court). If you're talking a criminal proceeding, the government can go after the individual in the other country via legal means, if the USA has a reciprocal agreement with that country. In the case of Mexico, a reciprocal agreement exists for most crimes, except capital punishment crimes. Whether or not the government wishes to spend the dollars to pursue a felon into another country is anybody's guess. It would depend upon the crime, the dollars, the time, and other factors. KJC I have read it! Reply Note: The message will remain in your "Unread" folder until you click the trash can or reply to it.

To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (333)	8/26/1998 10:07:00 PM
From: Cavalry	Respond to of 407

kerry start with these details if you say it smells bad do it in public forum i want the truth to be told. starts with aznt boss mike s. his stock has been between 2.75 and 3.60 for about 6 months, he is approached by andy mann of 1st concord, of mexico, they make a deal to do secondary offering of aznt stock, at 3,25 a share 4 mil shares, restricted i believe, instead andy mann somehow gets these restricted shares entered into dtc, through jb ozford, dtc blew it hence freeze, jb oxford i believe is on hook, dtc is in a heap of trouble, i need help flushing dtc out in their culbability, smith barney through a contact at dtc confirms dtc freeze, confirms from dtc huge oversold pos'n in aznt,cant confirm more, my broker at smith barney thinks mm will take fall not him, 1st concord gets served a mann says i am countersuing instead flees to mexico can aznt serve 1st concord in mexico, which i believe they did already? dinner time start there kerry back in 45 min if not too late way more to this case jesse