Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : What-Are-My-Motives WAMM THREAD - HIDDEN AGENDA'S ON SI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cavalry who wrote (346)	8/27/1998 8:58:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 407

Cavalry, after all this time and posts, the appropriate response duh. I will post this one last time. As best I can recall, I have only spoken to Mork once in my life, and that was at the urging of Pugs. I may have had a follow up call, I am not sure. Put me down for a maximum of 2 conversations ever with Mork in my whole life. Got it? You were thrown way off track because pugs and bmart, <s> and Riley make lots of things up. No I am not andy mann. What a stupid question. By now, those that read know who I am. (BTW, the letters have been found to be amusing...) Other questions regarding Mork's position in AZNT or other stocks I have no knowledge of, as he in my mind has always been basically irrelevant to all the stories. Focus should be on Zapara as I advised in March regarding AZNT. <s> Now question for you since you think you know so much, I have now once again explained my non relationship with Mork, yet you post it is well known I have some sort of relationship, don't avoid this any longer, I answered your questions, now you answer, who told you I have a relationship with Mork, and since as you say "it is so well known" provide details. LOL. Are you Andy Mann? If not how do you know? <s>

To: Cavalry who wrote (346)	8/27/1998 1:29:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 407

Calvalry, it is obvious to anyone following this, that it is you who has a hidden agenda on SI, and you will not fool the majority. You invited me over to talk because you thought you asked tough questions, but as a desk top publisher, you now realize that were light weight and made you look bad. Your comments last night, while not following my posting patterns make your assumptions once again look bad. You blew it. Your hidden agenda in this case is obvious, blew up in your face, and your lack of interest in knowing the truth is apparent for all to see. Good luck, hope your stock does extremely well, even though your agenda no longer is hidden.