Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : JAWS;A P/E of 2 with 150%/yr Erngs Growth!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: del clark who wrote (2550)	8/27/1998 3:10:00 PM
From: Zeus549	Respond to of 4230

del clark, Could you please explain your comment concerning th BK issue. What was the "source of origination"? From what I could tell, it was the US Bankruptcy Court in Waco TX. Do you have reason to believe that this wasn't the source? I've been trying to keep a good handle on the accuracy of statements made by those who are obviously either hyping or are true believers and those who appear to be neither but are asking pertinent questions and then those who are out right bashers. Right now it appears to be a pretty even fight IMO.

To: del clark who wrote (2550)	8/27/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: Leroyt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4230

del, What makes you think they "waived the 500k share personnnel dividend"? I understood that the insiders were intending to use these funds to purchase more of TGSK at low prices. Do you have other information? Makes no sense to "waive" a dividend payment to me. later, leroyt

To: del clark who wrote (2550)	8/27/1998 7:01:00 PM
From: Ron Harvey	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4230

<<They waived the 500,000 share personal dividend didn't they?>> Did they? Really? You have their word? First take a gander at the BK docs for Case #69762566. Phone 1-888-436-7477. Next try the BK attorney, Frank D. Thomas, Jr. at 254-776-3611 to try verify if Alvis Colin Smith, the client who filed for personal bankruptcy on 11/18/97, was the CEO of Tigershark at the time. Or, if you accept the BK and recognize the subsequent denial of it by Mr. Smith, even if you don't think it's a big deal, don't you think credibility is an issue. . . including a statement about waiving a dividend? After all, a witness's credibility is effectively impugned with one patent falsehood. It only takes one to color all other statements with suspicion. ( I think President Clinton is having that problem, too.)