To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (6786 ) 8/28/1998 12:14:00 AM From: firstman Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 8879
I was just passing it on, I do not even know the person who sent it to me, or that he was removed. I have not been following the personal bickering on this thread, and am not familiar with you either. This being the case, and your threat to turn me in, I decided I had better review this thread more thoroughly. I have come to the conclusion that your interest here is very questionable to say the least, your excessive time spent here trashing this stock is quite transparent. Every thread these days seems to have it's resident "savior", a poser who has a not-so-hidden motive to pick at the thread like a vulture. There is not a single soul here that is not out to make money, including yourself. Unfortunately, the methodology you choose is tiring, and possibly illegal-I do not know for sure. Of course, we cannot discount all the issues you have raised. There are many questions still to be resolved, as there are on all stocks trading in the pennies....which is why they are such ripe targets. In my opinion, this company has potential. Things are still in development, and as investors we will just have to ride it out or leave. Personally, I think the best way to approach this open forum is to put forth the appropriate questions, and then pursue the answers with true due diligence , sharing the info with all. This means no unfounded accusations, OR baseless hyping. Still, you are correct that the message I posted was of a personal nature. I should not have posted it, and for that I am sorry. On the other hand you might think carefully about the contents of said post. Flagrant baseless statements (ie: SEC involvement) are damaging and dangerous. If you have proof, spill it.....if not, you might also owe this thread an apology. Just My Opinion, of course.