Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Asterisk who wrote (14220)	8/28/1998 11:45:00 AM
From: Ingenious	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

Michael, sorry to be "blunt" but you are incorrect on several points: (By the way, did you get your CAPS LOCK STUCK or did you really mean to yell!!) >>>>I believe that you will find that people will in general turn a "blind ear" to this arguement<<<< 1. My topics are germane to the forum hence other people (that is other than you) have responded. Your comment is therefore misplaced. >>>but at least people new to the scene like Leland <<< 2. I am not new to the qcom thread or the SI forum. In fact, I have been a member almost since its inception in 1996. From your bio you have only been around since 1997. Again, your comment is incorrect. >>>I'm sorry to be so blunt here Leland but the subject of what patents QCOM does have and their coverage has been EXTREMELY throughly hashed out in this forum.<<< 3. No one (with the exception of Dave ;) ) on this thread has any idea of what they are talking about when it comes to patents. This is not suprising by the way since it is a very complicated area. It is not an area one dabbles in or has a "feel" for. >>>Leland could avoid the hot button issues.<<< 4. Isnt that what a forum IS about? Thus, because of its controversy it makes an excellent or should I say EXCELLENT topic for discussion. >>>I really wish that the webmistress had set up a thing to click on for each forum that is a FAQ area. <<< 4. If a discussion of patents REALLY gets under your skin then I suggest not reading the comments. 5. By the way, perhaps you should read "Fahrenheit 451". EOM