SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1998 Short Picks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Roger A. Babb who wrote (13219)8/28/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: put2rich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18691
 
Roger and All,
today seems to be the day of internuts: most or all get killed!!
which ones are still good to short? (amzn the best to bad Datek s..cks)



To: Roger A. Babb who wrote (13219)8/28/1998 12:48:00 PM
From: Al Chechatka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18691
 
Roger,

I have been watching CLCX go down from 20 to 5 this month. I was long this stock because I believed it really had a great market. Good earnings, lawsuit settled with AG in CLCX's favor, and education growth rate because of Federal Money from Bill Clinton.

They had a shareholders lawsuit that dropped the stock from the low 20's down to 13 or so. I still feel that it has no substance, and was filed 3 months after the findings were found.

The short interest was huge ... over 8 million. The total number of shares was 17 million and only I believe 7 million were not held by insiders (I'm not positive on the 7 million part) So almost all shares were short.

Eventhough I thought the lawsuit was frivolous, and the company would bounce from 12 back to 20, I was scared of that short interest. 1) Should that have been a huge red flag that there was so much short interest with this stock? 2) Will they cover now that the stock has gone down 75% or will most ride it even further. 3) With that much short interest, have you ever seen it burn the shorts. 4) Could the shorts have manipulated the stock from 20 to 13 with the lawsuit (today's drop was due to lower earnings and had no caused by the shorts).

I am still long the company, but I have never seen so much short interest in a stock and I should have gotten out much sooner. I wish I would have told you about this company sooner so I could have possibly taken your advice and maybe you could have profited.

Thanks in advance,

Al C.



To: Roger A. Babb who wrote (13219)8/28/1998 1:47:00 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 18691
 
Hi, Roger!

Some rather urgent question on GMGC. GMGC look like a broken stock,
gyrating today, now at 7 3/8 (+2 1/4). I think, I have already read about GMGC in this thread or the broken stock thread. What do you think, can you give me some hints?

Starting with a small long at 6 it already went through some gates turning my position into an outright short now.

Volume already > 3M.

Thank you in advance

Christian



To: Roger A. Babb who wrote (13219)8/28/1998 1:59:00 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18691
 
GMGC: Looks like a fully fledged P&D. Stock went off 7 on heavy volume, now at 6 13/16. Time to pile up?

Christian



To: Roger A. Babb who wrote (13219)8/28/1998 1:59:00 PM
From: Peter V  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 18691
 
Roger and all, I know this is a short thread, but anyone buying GOLD stocks? Dollar is getting hammered today, and the last safe haven may be gold, which is incredibly cheap right now. Any thoughts? NEM 2001 10 calls look cheap at about $3 of premium ($8 for a $15 stock). Any thoughts?