To: jhild who wrote (12797 ) 8/28/1998 12:09:00 PM From: StandFast Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 43774
No problem, here is your post. Still awaiting answer. Don't question other people's posts if you can't support your own. <<To: ColleenB (12663 ) From: jhild Wednesday, Aug 26 1998 9:49AM ET Reply # of 12799 Of course another explanation is that John Schmitz has no arrangement and the first Press Release was a lie. So this whole election business is a convenient excuse to blow smoke and distract. I have often wondered the way you use DD whether you really mean "delay and distract". >> Please back up your statement with proof, please do not try to redirect the question. <<no arrangement and the first Press Release was a lie.>> Please post verification of your statement or are you trying to mislead? The following post was not a valid answer, you are basically saying, "i'm doing it cause someone else is", please argue with facts. Your repeated posts to avoid the question: <<To: StandFast (12697 ) From: jhild Wednesday, Aug 26 1998 5:18PM ET Reply # of 12732 Hey my speculation is every bit as valid as ColleenB's. You don't ask her for proof, because you and so many others want so desperately to believe that version. When you offer links to back up your speculations, then we will have all advanced toward getting at the real story. >> <<To: StandFast (12667 ) From: jhild Wednesday, Aug 26 1998 10:51AM ET Reply # of 12696 Hey my speculation is every bit as valid as ColleenB's. You don't ask her for proof, because you and so many others want so desperately to believe that version. When you offer links to back up your speculations, then we will have all advanced toward getting at the real story. >>