Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1035)	8/28/1998 4:13:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Like asking Mark Fuhrman if he ever used the "N" word? bp

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1035)	8/28/1998 4:13:00 PM
From: micny	Respond to of 67261

I was under the impression that, against all good advice, Clinton CHOSE to continue to defend himslef against PJ, thinking he could "outsmart" everyone. Sure got his ...... caught in a wringer trying to outsmart smarter people that he, didn't he?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1035)	8/28/1998 4:42:00 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 67261

<<dispite the fact that the incident had nothing to do with the inquiry in question>> A single isolated incident? How about a year and a half sexual affair with a low level staffer? The problem here of course is that the man was being accused in a law suit of being a sexual predator. The accusers were trying to demonsrtate his pattern of behavior. A pattern where subordinates were rewarded for sexual favors. In that context I believe his perjury to be serious. Beyond lying, he will be proven guilty of obstruction of justice, a more serious offense in most legal opinions.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1035)	8/28/1998 5:45:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

<<dispite the fact that the incident had nothing to do with the inquiry in question>> A single isolated incident? How about a year and a half sexual affair with a low level staffer? The problem here of course is that the man was being accused in a law suit of being a sexual predator. The accusers were trying to demonstrate his pattern of behavior. A pattern where subordinates were rewarded for sexual favors. In that context I believe his perjury to be serious. Beyond lying, he will be proven guilty of obstruction of justice, a more serious offense in most legal opinions.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1035)	8/28/1998 7:18:00 PM
From: micny	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I was under the impression that, against all good advice, Clinton CHOSE to continue to defend himslef against PJ, thinking he could "outsmart" everyone. Sure got his ...... caught in a wringer trying to outsmart smarter people that he, didn't he?