SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jhild who wrote (12856)8/28/1998 7:17:00 PM
From: BONGIZMO  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 43774
 
My you are a name dropper aren't you? Also a tad bit defensive it seems. Questioning my DD was a nice trick but alas I am bringing up your actions and as mentioned made no reference to your comments on PRWT, simply what I perceive to be unwarranted references to others in posts as you just did. Your issue with Standfast should be between the two of you, and you just brought up Isoman which also simply reinforces my point. Why are you bringing others up in a negative light to anyone but the said individuals? Again say what you wish about a stock but the personal references about posters to others than the said individual is IMO uncalled for.

Finally I could care less about making you mad, you already appear quite bitter (market not treating you well perhaps?) and need no goading by me.



To: jhild who wrote (12856)8/29/1998 11:05:00 AM
From: StandFast  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 43774
 
You fail to respond to actual questions from anyone. Yet you post your questions, and when no one responds, you push it as fact. It is obvious that you have been neglected for a major portion of your life, and have no other recourse than to attempt to dissolve any positive thoughts that may come your way. You are probably a convict in prison, with nothing better to do than sit at the terminal all day and attempt to interact with others.

<< You interjected yourself into a conversation that I was not having with you.>>

This seems to be a fault that you have. Follow your own methods. We do not wish you to respond to our posts, cause we wish no interaction with you.

<<No due diligence for you I see. >>

This is typical of all your posts. You do NO DD other than rewording other posts, for your own negative direction.

To: BONGIZMO (12861 )
From: jhild Friday, Aug 28 1998 7:41PM ET
Reply # of 12873

Questioning my DD was a nice trick but alas I am bringing up your actions . . .

No trick at all. You interjected yourself into a conversation that I was not having with you. Had you taken the trouble to trace the thread of that conversation backwards, as at this point you must still not have, you would have discovered you were making a mistake

To: BONGIZMO (12864 )
From: jhild Friday, Aug 28 1998 8:27PM ET
Reply # of 12873

So I see. Now your true agenda is clear. You haven't come to praise me. You have come to pick a fight with me. No due diligence for you I see. No real concern for attacks against others by me. Just here to try and take me on. You're just the boastful attacker. More the pity for you. And greater the loss for this thread.

And you talk about hypocrisy.