SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bucky89 who wrote (53146)8/29/1998 9:13:00 PM
From: djane  Read Replies (8) | Respond to of 61433
 
BusinessWeek article. CSCO, Siemens or ASND to buy CIEN?

businessweek.com@@URd2vmcAp*QOKwAA/premium/36/b3594076.htm

TELLABS HAS A REALLY BAD DAY

Its bid for fiber-optic company Ciena
is in peril

For years, Tellabs Inc. has been one of Wall Street's favorite overachievers. The
telecom equipment maker could do no wrong as it pushed into overseas markets,
acquired several competitors, and kept revenues growing at a 30% annual clip.
But suddenly, its future as a telecom behemoth is at risk.

Tellabs' most important deal to date, a one-for-one stock swap with Ciena
Corp., is in jeopardy. On Aug. 21, AT&T unexpectedly dumped Ciena as a
potential supplier. The news sent Ciena's stock plunging 45%, from $56.78 a
share to $31.25. It later recovered only slightly, closing at $34.25 on Aug. 26.

The setback raises questions about the quality of Ciena's main product, which
multiplies the bandwidth of fiber-optic cables. And it casts doubt on the wisdom
of Tellabs' merger decision. Still, Tellabs CEO Michael J. Birck faces a thorny
dilemma: Knowing that others may be interested in Ciena, how hard should he
fight to keep the deal?

CISCO TALKS? With investors waiting impatiently, the Tellabs board huddled
for more than six hours on Aug. 25 at the company's suburban Chicago
headquarters. Birck was unavailable for comment, but sources close to the talks
expect Tellabs to offer Ciena shareholders about three-fourths of a Tellabs share
for every Ciena share, making the deal worth close to $5 billion, down from the
original $7.1 billion.

Though Ciena has said the loss of AT&T won't significantly affect earnings,
analysts say a discounted bid makes sense. Not only has Ciena lost AT&T, but it
also faces new competition that could lure away longtime customers like
WorldCom Inc.

Pursuing the merger with Ciena also makes sense for Tellabs, which makes
equipment that connects digital networks. Tellabs needs to diversify its product
line, and Ciena will help it move into the fiber-optic arena. Says John B. Leo,
vice-president of the Northern Trust Co., a Tellabs shareholder: Without Ciena
and its technology, Tellabs' growth ''might otherwise slow.''

So the risks of a lowball offer are huge, warns Michael Davies, a
telecommunications networking analyst at Punk, Ziegel & Co. in New York.
Ciena already has been approached by a second suitor. On May 6, a month after
Tellabs began its formal talks, Ciena reported in a proxy statement that an
unnamed company had expressed interest in it. That company, several analysts
say, was Cisco Systems Inc. A Cisco spokesman calls Ciena's wave division
multiplexing (WDM) product, which allows networks to carry 40 times their
normal amount, ''an important technology,'' but he wouldn't comment on a bid for
the company.

Cisco may not be the only suitor that has looked Ciena over either. Analysts
agree Ciena would fit nicely with German electronics giant Siemens or network
equipment maker Ascend Communications. Both refuse comment on bidding,
and a Siemens spokesman says the company will introduce its own, low-end
WDM product in mid-September.

Even so, analysts see a Ciena acquisition as a way for Siemens to reel in such
U.S. heavyweights as Sprint Corp. and WorldCom. For Ascend, it's the ''next
logical step,'' says Timothy J. Smith of tech research firm Dataquest Inc. Ascend,
based in Alameda, Calif., also makes digital switches but lacks the kind of optical
equipment Ciena makes.
[But, Mory has said ASND will partner with (not buy) WDM vendors and it already has a joint venture with Pirelli for the product being used by WMB. Given the TLAB fiasco, it seems to have been, once again, a prescient strategy. Go Mory.]

No doubt, Birck and his board are sweating over the risk of getting trumped. But
to keep Wall Street applauding, Birck knows he has to keep finding more cards
up his sleeve.

By Roger O. Crockett in Chicago, with Andy Reinhardt in San Mateo

Updated Aug. 27, 1998 by bwwebmaster
Copyright 1998, by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use




To: bucky89 who wrote (53146)8/29/1998 10:17:00 PM
From: gbh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
bucky89, come on, you really believe ASND would turn down a $72 offer from ERICY, or anyone else (OK, maybe Zapata :))? Its very difficult for me to accept ASND getting 75% takeover premium from anyone, in this market environment.

And why do think Mory has such a bias toward LU? I would think just the opposite. Most of his company, including the piece that would rightly be called "his baby" (TNT), competes directly with LU's remote access business. I'd think Mory was pissed as hell when LU bought Livingston, and doubly pissed when they bought Yurie (total SA overlap), and then triply pissed when they bought Prominet (GRF overlap). I just can't envision such a high premium when billions will end up on the chopping block, just to get WAN switching. I know it's of premiere importance, but LU had there chance to get the whole caboodle when there was no overlap, rolled their dice, and lost, and moved on.

And don't underestimate the IP expertise that was purchased in that Prominet deal. I know, I know, LU can't spell IP. Damn, that makes me laugh everytime I see it. But LU is major player, and I'd guess there is plenty of IP expertise in the company, both from the Prominet deal, and homegrown in the last couple of years.

I will try to gather as much info as I can from someone working in their ATM trenches. No high placed executive contacts like others purport to have. Just a peon engineer, like me who was hired about 6 months ago specifically to do ATM.

Also, don't believe for a minute that companies such as LU and CSCO have many teams "competing" to develop like products. Those days are long gone. Way, way too expensive. I worked for IBM (the biggest of the big) for 11 years until 1993, and that practice was virtually non-existant since the late 80's, and even then only occurred on the rarest of occasions.

gary