Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (18671)	8/31/1998 6:24:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

It is a crime if the purpose of giving the job is to interfere with an investigation whether he dallied or not. JLA

To: E who wrote (18671)	8/31/1998 8:10:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

>>My intuition is that Willey wasn't repulsed by her experience with the president, and that the account of Julia Steele that passes the smile test is the one that agrees with that of the president's enemy, the ubiquitous Linda Tripp, who was there and observed Willey to be flushed and delighted on leaving the president's office. Better yet to assume that Linda misread Willey's reaction to fit what was routine and expected. It would have been natural for her to assume that Willey was just another bimbo being used by the pervert. Remember that Willey had nothing to gain and much to lose by telling her story - she had in fact tried not to testify and had turned down book offers when the offers posed conditions that required that she change her story to fit what the Clintons wanted her to say. Steele, however, changed her story for money and now is under investigation for obstruction of justice.