Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (18743)	9/1/1998 3:03:00 PM
From: Who, me?	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Right on Zoltan!! Carol Moseley-Braun is out of here too. The year of the woman will finally be over!!! Six years was enough. I hear Patty Murray from Washington is in trouble too! What's your estimate in the House?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (18743)	9/1/1998 3:04:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Zolt, You think Fong will win decisively? He seems to be a fairly weak campaigner. bp

To: Zoltan! who wrote (18743)	9/1/1998 3:20:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Zoltan I am from the Bay Area and I cant stand Barbara Boxer. But when both parties fail you on issues then I find its best just to go with the smartest (party). The republicans are about as smart as one of those mice that keeps getting zizzed every time he goes for the cheese. You cannot win in California if you are a pro-gun, pro-Christian coalition, family values spouting, ultra right wing nut. Hence, (notice - conservatives a cause and effect relationship here), republicans do not win. If they put a moderate in there they would win. PS Hershensohn (sp?) was one of those right wing nuts who WILL NOT WIN in Ca. Boxer was (barely) the lesser of 2 evils. Huffington (another intellectually challenged, choosing to run against the tremendously popular moderate Feinstein) COULD have won against Boxer.