Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: normy who wrote (12746)	9/2/1998 1:12:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Hi toma. .and they refute the original "proven" value as unsubstantiated, it would seem that GE would have to walk away, or perhaps run - with the SEC on their heels. they don't appear to have the resources to continue. plus, what other top rated firm would want to touch it... Not really, toma! If perchance the original proven value is not substantiated. GE will be given opportunity to refute BD's(or whomever) findings. The SEC has question with the report, but they have not filed formal charge, nor could they without giving GE an opportunity to clear their name! As far as $$ is concerned, there is always somebody out there willing to finance ....for a price! PS when saying "been their" I was referring to a specific place, like their not "there" nor "thar"! so when saying been "there", you are referring to some place! I was not, I was "their", in a specific place. I remember the place very clearly, because while "their", I lost my shirt!<gggg> the Chief