Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DELL Bear Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Phoenix who wrote (1795)	9/2/1998 4:40:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2578

Gary, fyi I was doing some evaluation on Dell mid-range server line and came up with the same 3 criteria you had in your post. I feel Dell will excel on all three items vs. their competition for the server line (Compaq and Sun), due mostly to the impending commoditization of the space brought forth by sql server and NT. For the rest of the Dell products, I dont know its a judgement call, however this pretty well sums up the challenges. Some of the bulls should read this post imo. Michelle

To: The Phoenix who wrote (1795)	9/2/1998 8:30:00 PM
From: Stewart Walton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2578

Factors for continued success. You said To be a bull at even these levels one has to believe: 1) DELL will continue to take market share at faster rates and/or 2) DELL will succeed in new markets where they currently don't exist and 3) Competitors will fail miserably at retooling their distribution models or they will decide that they have no aspirations for increased revenue or earnings. I agree with you up to a point, which is the degree they have to succeed in each area. Market share: DELL claims to have 12% of the market now (I think that's the number), which is not a huge or even large share. Why can't it grow faster than the entire market grows? The big companies still only account for less than half of the market, and DELL is still executing better than the others. Also, it doesn't need to accelerate its growth, just keep it steady, which is enough of a challenge. In fact, it doesn't even have to grow market share at all, if it can meet the numbers. Market size: DELL continually expands its market geographically and technologically (China, storage), thus opening up new opportunities. It appears that they are doing this methodically in several markets, and I believe they have a fairly high probability of success. Competition: First, this is not a zero-sum game. Markets overlap. Gateway claims it is not competing with DELL. Maybe, maybe not, but certainly Dell is not competing with the same companies in each market. So they are (or will be) less susceptible to one breakthrough company eating their lunch. Second, I think the existing competition is going to have a hard time changing themselves to compete effectively with DELL's direct/JIT/BTO model. It is extremely difficult for a company to reinvent itself, cannibilizing the model that made it successful in the first place. IBM did it with the System360, and maybe there are other examples. I'm not a good enough student to cite them, but I think they are very few. Compaq has to say they are changing to meet DELL's model. I just don't think they can do it in a head-to-head competition. Wouldn't it be funny to see Compaq get out of the manufacturing business in a few years, and team up with DELL to provide service? In short, I think DELL can succeed in all three areas: Market share, market scope, and competition. The question that I keep coming back to is: who will do it better, and what's their story? Regards, Stewart