Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ARAKIS: HIGH RISK OIL PLAY (AKSEF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edward M. Zettlemoyer who wrote (9094)	9/6/1998 1:58:00 AM
From: cree fetterman	Respond to of 9164

This might give some idea of why Christian Africa might want Sudan oil! utah.edu

To: Edward M. Zettlemoyer who wrote (9094)	9/10/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: Dan Lisman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9164

TLM goes up and AKSEF goes down? and Volume on AKSEF has fallen way off of average. This is beginning to bother me. Obviously AKSEF shareholders will vote For merger. But can TLM shareholders veto merger? Ed, I know you have had contact with Arakis. Have you (or has anyone? Zeev?) had contact with Talisman (TLM)?? I thought this was a "done deal" when TLM loaned AKSEF $22 million for collateral of 22 million shares of AKSEF. What if TLM takes their 22 million shares (which is 1/4 of all AKSEF shares) and says that is enough "Sudan exposure" for now? TLM would go up (because TLM shareholders did not like deal anyway) and Then TLM (Buckee) could "LOAN" another 22 million dollars for collateral of another 22 million shares.? Guess we still have a $1. "floor", but how sure is (arbitrage) profit? Mostly just thinking out loud here (in print?<g>) Anybody else? Dan