Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (4027)	9/7/1998 1:48:00 AM
From: Cavalry	Respond to of 26163

ONLY THING THAT MATTERS FROM HERE TO FRIDAY IS VOLUME AND PRICE jeff you are right nothing left to discuss table is set only question left is who will be eating crow and who will be serving it up. i know everyone said by last monday, we were all a little premature i tell no one to buy or sell here by friday a winner will be declared those shorts are squirmy little suckers seems it took an extra week to finally corner them see you friday after the close of trading my name is cav i will be your waiter how would you like your crow prepared j

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (4027)	9/7/1998 1:49:00 AM
From: bmart	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

Mr. Mitchell, The DTC is frozen. There is not one share of AZNT stock on the street. Furthermore , "electronically " means he is shorting. If you are aware of the court case vs. MANN, JB OXFORD, CITIBANK, CANACORD, FIRST CONDCORD, WHITECLIFF AND SHORELINE, then you know it has been a game of musical shares. These accounts were frozen to end that game. The covering will commence once AZNT puts out a release disclosing everyone has been served and clarifies the last phase of it's incremental program to cleanse the AZNT market of 4MM+ illegal and invalid shares. Not before. As for your claim that Wellrich won an arbitration bid over AZNT, can you inform me how a company with no contract can go to arbitration. When Mr. Schurer left Wellrich, him being the only licensed broker there, the contract ended. You cannot force arbitration when there was no contract to arbitrate. I suggest you owe this thread a big apology for the hype and fabricated claims you have made about any kind of arbitration hearings or judgements against AZNT. It is all bogus. RB

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (4027)	9/7/1998 8:13:00 AM
From: Just My Opinion	Respond to of 26163

Jeff: Here are the weekly trading records: investor.msn.com What can be inferred from them, I guess would be up to interpretation. To me, it appears that some short covering happened, I guess. The explanation that you are giving about someone else covering for someone else, I would need a little more detail to believe that, myself. (I don't understand how that could be done.) At the site that I have given you, there is also a side bar link to the statement about aznt concerning the contact? with brazil, I believe.It states that they have an agreement with the government to export. The SEC link,I think it is. (it was late last ight) I did not see the word "exclusive" in that form. I think it was a 10qsb..(I am repeating that # from memory, so give me some slack) If you can't find it I will look again. investor.msn.com However, remember often times people misinterprete things when they read, I guess that is due to "exhuberence", I don't know. Also in one of the forms there was a mention about a form that was late, I think due to some clarification by the SEC, about their product..(I think that's what it was) investor.msn.com If these links have already been posted, please excuse the repetitious posts. EDIT: I added the links, but I am not sure if I have them in the proper order.

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (4027)	9/7/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: bmart	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

"........I'm told a private transaction between Marcasse and Mann would not show on the tape. Marcasse would borrow shares from the DTC and give them electronically to Mann's account......." Mr. Mitchell, In other words you are saying Marcasse sold short again. There is not a lick of AZNT stock on the street and the DTC has a freeze on AZNT stock. He made the transaction "electronically", he sold short AZNT. Say ,for example, that Mr. Marcassi is thinking of using some AZNT stock that is 'frozen' somewhere, say, as an example, our Mr. Charlie's stock, to back his short. Until Mr. Charlie can get Mr. Marcassi the stock (which doesn't look possible by any stretch of the imagination since his stock is invalid) , Mr. Marcassi would be short Mr. Mann's position on TOP of the 1.8MM he, himself, is short AZNT. Now, Mr. Zapara's account is frozen too. Mr. Zapara's raison d'etre is to support Mr. Mork's shorts. Mr. Zapara came upon AZNT stock in a most suspect way, and his accounts were frozen, which brings us back to Mr. Charlie. It seems Mr. Charlie's invalid shares frozen in his account may be quite popular stock amongst a very tight-knit group of shorts, i.e.; Messrs. Mork, Charlie, Marcassi, etc,. On top of that Ms. Shell and yourself procure some very suspect and inflammatory information regarding bogus arbitration hearings and judgements. The SEC, nor AZNT or the NASD provided that information. Mr. Mitchell, I would hate to think you are a part of this group but rather are simply being used by them. Do you really think that Messrs. Martin, Tonto & Lore follow me around for kicks? Good Day RB