Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tero kuittinen who wrote (14665)	9/7/1998 10:33:00 AM
From: lazarre	Respond to of 152472

Just a purely political observation, here, but I think you may be guilty of the sin of omission. Sorry but true. In your list of conservative whatevers you forgot to mention these 2 stalwarts of the right wing cabal supporting Q: Fritz Hollings and Matsui of Calif.( hardly candidates for the " most beloved " list of the right ). L

To: tero kuittinen who wrote (14665)	9/7/1998 11:04:00 AM
From: Valueman	Respond to of 152472

Tero: Any argument you make can be so easily countered with one of the oldest, most oft-repeated quotes on the Qualcomm thread---"If Qualcomm and its CDMA technology is not important to the future of wireless communications, then why does ERICY bother with them? Why do they even mention their name in passing?" Why? Because QCOM holds the key, and ERICY can't have it.

To: tero kuittinen who wrote (14665)	9/7/1998 11:05:00 AM
From: Jon Koplik	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Tero - how is is that you literally seem to know more about "popular culture" and U.S. politicians than I do? (I guess this is probably more a reflection on me than you ...) But, once again, you have me suspicious about whether or not you are really just some smart scientist in Europe, and not some "operative" for Ericsson or ETSI? Maybe one of us on the thread should really take you up on your offer to visit you in Finland (?) Jon.