SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave Bissett who wrote (2345)9/7/1998 2:38:00 PM
From: Sean W. Smith  Respond to of 14778
 
All,

FYI.... The inwin I referenced is a full tower. Dual 40+ Watt CPU's doesn't help...

Sean



To: Dave Bissett who wrote (2345)9/7/1998 10:34:00 PM
From: Zeuspaul  Respond to of 14778
 
>>recommends against midtower cases for all PII's categorically<<

I think this borders on the simplistic. Perhaps this was written before the more efficient processors were introduced. I favor full towers but for different reasons. I want the increased room for drives. I see a marginal cooling improvement as an added benefit, not a determining factor.

Properly installed CPU and case cooling fans should have more of an affect on temperature than case size IMO. I would feel comfortable with one 7200 RPM HD, 3 expansion cards and a PII 300 with good case airflow and a quality CPU fan. (from a temperature perspective)

Zeuspaul



To: Dave Bissett who wrote (2345)9/8/1998 12:42:00 AM
From: Howard R. Hansen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14778
 
>> Wow! What differences. Looks like I just decided to go to the 333 over the 300, but then the cost savings starts shrinking so maybe I'll argue myself into a 350. To press the cooling issue a bit further, however, the site mentioned recommends against midtower cases for all PII's categorically.<<

Another alternative is to use a Celeron 333A. It is about 10% slower than a PII 333, costs about $50 less and only uses 21 watts of power.