SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Electro Scientific??? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: vinh pham who wrote (427)9/8/1998 10:03:00 AM
From: Mark Oliver  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 723
 
The Chicago Board of Trade keeps a listing of options in a table form for all traded stocks including ESIO. The prices are delayed, but the data is interesting.

cboe.com

Specific ESIO quotes.

cboe.pcquote.com

Regards,

Mark



To: vinh pham who wrote (427)9/10/1998 9:47:00 AM
From: Mark Oliver  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 723
 
From Page One of Electronic News: September 7, 1998 Issue

Far East Fallout

Hyundai, LG To Merge Semi Operations

Seoul, Korea--Last week's long-awaited news that LG Semicon and Hyundai Electronics Industries have caved in to Korean government pressure and agreed in principle to merge their semiconductor operations may or may not improve the desolate financial situation here, but analysts seem fairly certain it will have minimal effect on the dismal conditions in the DRAM market.

According to several industry analysts, the shake-up for the market is negligible as long as the merged company continues running at the same capacity as the two companies did previously.

"Right now, it really doesn't change the DRAM market very much in that you still have an oversupply," said George Iwanyc, an analyst with San Jose, Calif.-based market research firm Dataquest. "It will take time for that oversupply to disappear. Right now, with what we know about the merger, nothing (in the market) has really changed."

Indeed, details are sketchy at best. It is known that LG and Hyundai agreed in principle to merge the semiconductor operations, and that agreement was announced last week by the Federation of Korean Industries.

So far, though, no formal agreements have been signed, and details need to be hammered out regarding which company will hold a higher stake and what executive will run the merged company. In fact, some industry reports out of Asia last week indicated that there is skepticism among Asian financial analysts about when--or if--the deal will be completed.

The Korean government has been under pressure itself. Ever since the International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailed out Korea to the tune of $58.35 billion late last year, the organization has been after Korea to clean up some of the excessive investment and overcapacity of the nation's large conglomerates, or chaebol, which many blame for Korean woes. After months of teeth pulling, the chaebol apparently agreed to several of the mergers that had been rumored for months.

"It is going to take some time until both parties agree on exact terms and conditions," said C.S. Chong, senior VP at Hyundai Electronics America (HEA). Mr. Chong would not speculate as to how long.

While analysts agreed this merger would not alleviate the soft conditions in the DRAM market that have existed for more than two years, they agreed that the consolidation of the two companies' DRAM market share would most likely create a new No. 2 player in the market.

According to Dataquest, Hyundai was No. 3 in the world in DRAM revenues in 1997, with a 9 percent market share. LG, meanwhile, was seventh in the world, with a 7 percent market share. Once merged, the companies would have a 16 percent market share (based on 1997 figures), just three percentage points behind market-leading Samsung Semiconductor. The market had already been consolidated significantly a couple of months ago when Micron Technology bought the DRAM business of Texas Instruments (EN, June 22). By Dataquest's numbers, that marriage would be good enough for a 14 percent market share and now, apparently, the world's No. 3 position.

"One of the things we can clearly say is that this merger is increasing the concentration in the DRAM market," said Steve Cullen, senior analyst with In-Stat, a Scottsdale, Ariz.-based market research firm. Mr. Cullen, whose numbers vary slightly from Dataquest's, said the LG/Hyundai merger translates into about 16.5 percent market share, while TI/Micron would hold about 15.1 percent. "Between those three companies (the two mergers and Samsung), you have 50 percent of the market. All of the other guys are going to have to try to carve their share out of the remaining 50 percent."

Mr. Chong said this merger may prove stronger than Micron's TI acquisition. "Micron will take some time to upgrade the facilities it purchased from TI," Mr. Chong said. "The facilities of LG and Hyundai are already state of the art."

"There seems to be a general thinking in the DRAM business that a larger market share is a better thing to have," said James Handy, an analyst at Dataquest. "I think that goes back to some study done by Westinghouse in 1930s. So far, it really doesn't seem to be the case."

All the analysts Electronic News spoke with expect Samsung to retain its No. 1 position in the market, regardless of any LG/Hyundai merger. "They are in a position to defend that," Mr. Iwaync said.

Officials from Samsung Semiconductor did not respond to requests for information about how the LG/Hyundai merger would affect Samsung.

Mario Morales, manager of semiconductor research at International Data Corp. (IDC), said rumors in recent months have involved a merger between Samsung Semiconductor and LG Semicon. In the end, though, he said Korea felt LG and Samsung together would control too much of the memory market. "I think it is better for Korea to have two very strong companies," he said.

"One thing that is always a challenge is, 'How do you deal with your customer base?' Large vendors don't want to be too dependent on one customer," Mr. Iwanyc said. "If you are running into a situation where LG and Hyundai both supply a large percentage of DRAM to one customer, it could be a problem. But that probably would have been a bigger issue if Samsung had been in a merger with one of the two."

Mr. Chong of Hyundai said he did not believe Samsung would be affected by the merger. "To a large extent, Samsung's position will be kind of neutral," he said. "I think there is no benefit from Samsung's perspective. They already have the largest market share." Mr. Chong added, " I don't think Samsung would be participating in this type of arrangement. The combination of Samsung and LG would pose more of a negative connotation to the customers."

Mr. Chong said he expects customers to benefit from the arrangement. "From the customers' perspective, it (the relationship with the merged company) may be better, because most of LG Semicon's sales activities so far have been through Hitachi," he said. "The combined capacity (of the merged company) will provide a stable source of supply. In that sense, it may be more complementary."

Generally, observers agreed that the merger is a necessary move. Many said the Korean government had to do something to show that it was making progress.

"I think it has to happen," Mr. Morales said. "There is no way these companies can continue to garner all the losses that they have been scoring."

"I don't think it's going to help a whole lot in the short run," Mr. Cullen said.

An official from LG Semicon also confirmed there is an agreement to merge in principle, but would not comment beyond that.



To: vinh pham who wrote (427)9/11/1998 3:36:00 PM
From: Mark Oliver  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 723
 
Some interesting comments.

Message 5721375



To: vinh pham who wrote (427)9/16/1998 10:17:00 AM
From: Mark Oliver  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 723
 
Looks like nerves on earnings are high. Have you heard yet when they wil announce? Did you attend the annual meeting? Was it positive?

Trading under $16 now which was the last posted number I saw for book value. I'm thinking of averaging down now. Said I'd hold off until it dipped below book. Was hoping that wouldn't happen.

Here's a note from of perhaps positive news.

From the September 14, 1998 Issue of Electronic News

The Antenna

NOT IN MY BACK END--When asked, what does the latest round of DRAM fab closures mean for test system suppliers, Nick Konidaris, Advantest America chairman, president and CEO, told EN, "Those companies that are addressing the high end of the business are not going to be affected. Other companies addressing the lower part of the business are going to be affected." He said the DRAM shake-ups have "no foreseeable affect on Advantest. The overcapacity in our end of the business has bottomed out." So, when can we expect an uptick? Mr. Konidaris does not have a set timetable. With 64-megabit DRAM-and-above prices stable, additional investment by select DRAM makers will be the final arbiter of when and how fast the DRAM tester market recovers.


Solectron did well. Could be positive.

Very negative, wafer sales are down.

MEMC warns of more red ink

Wednesday, September 16, 1998

By Virginia Baldwin Hick
Of the Post-Dispatch
Bad news continues in the semiconductor industry, and it continues to trickle down to suppliers like MEMC Electronic Materials Inc., the world's second-largest maker of silicon wafers.

MEMC, based in O'Fallon, Mo., said Tuesday that its third-quarter loss would be greater than expected, and that it will continue to shut down production for a few days here and there to cut costs and reduce supply.

MEMC's wafers are made into silicon chips, which are the base for microprocessors used in computers, microwaves, cars, cellular phones, digital cameras, "smart" credit cards and a host of products that consumers take for granted.

Because of the continuing financial crisis in Asia, particularly the recession in Japan, worldwide demand is down for such products.

"This is more of a volume- or demand-driven impact," said Sam Duggan, MEMC spokesman. "We don't think we've lost market share."

Prices have softened, mostly because of pressure from manufacturers of chips and devices that use chips. Intel Corp., for instance, cut prices this week on some of its microprocessors. That price cut may spur demand for computers, and eventually for silicon wafers. But in the short run, cuts like Intel's pressure companies like MEMC to offer price breaks to their customers.

MEMC employs about 1,900 people in O'Fallon, including 1,500 in its wafer plant there. Most plant workers took a four-day Labor Day holiday this month, with the option of counting the extra days as vacation.

Such short-term shutdowns will continue at MEMC plants around the world, Duggan said. MEMC employs 6,800 worldwide, but not all will be affected by plant shutdowns.

Duggan said not all shutdowns would be keyed to local holidays, but he said he expected similar extended holidays around Thanksgiving and Christmas and perhaps other events around the world. "We're trying to better manage current capacity with anticipated demand," he said.

A company statement released late Tuesday said MEMC expects sales in the third quarter to be between $160 million and $165 million, because of lower product volume and prices. Revenue in the second quarter was $202 million, and that was down 17 percent from last year's second quarter.

MEMC will report third-quarter results Oct. 26.

MEMC also announced that its "negative margin" would be in the mid- to high teens, which could translate into an operating loss of about $30 million. The loss could be much higher when other costs are figured in.

Michael Ferguson, an analyst with Pauli & Co. in Clayton who follows MEMC, said the loss might be greater than $50 million.

In the second quarter, MEMC took a $147 million loss, including more than $105 million in restructuring costs.

Ferguson has had a "hold" rating on MEMC's stock since last October. "It's been nearly a year," he said. "I was hoping to see light at the end of the tunnel.

"I think the steps they're taking will position them well when the market turns," Ferguson continued. "I would prefer they were in better shape from a demand standpoint, but it's not something in their control. They can't just switch and make something else.''

Tuesday's announcement came after the stock market closed. MEMC closed at
$5.75, up 13 cents, but is down 62 percent so far this year.

Copyright (c) 1998, St. Louis Post-Dispatch


CNBC announced that MOT was closing a fab in Virginia. Don't know what they were making there, but again a closing is not good. In the, these steps will be very positive as it's he only way for these companies to recover. Also, new products will require purchases from ESI. I think we could dip further, but long term it is probably a good buy here. Still, who's got long term money here?

Maybe Greenspan says the right thing?

Regards,

Mark