Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (64135)	9/9/1998 6:49:00 AM
From: MONACO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Bottom line Paul, would you say this PCI thing is good, bad, or not important to Intel's future bottom line?? Thanx for the previous response...M

To: Paul Engel who wrote (64135)	9/9/1998 11:24:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 186894

Paul, you are a great falsificator, Penang is still burning in your heart <g>... Look: <Apparently, HP, Compaq and IBM cooked up an extension, PCIx,> So, this "troika", in your opinion, can only "cook up" something unimportant while only Intel does true inventions... right? <Meanwhile, Intel seems to have only recently released "advanced PCI" chip sets of its own...> On their own? Don't they just recently acquired the entire DEC chipset fab with all the rights for PCI-64 bridges? Those bridges they apparently were not able to design on their own, even with their huge R&D budget? <For a much more advanced bus, Intel seems to be re-evaluating the parallel bus in its entirety, looking instead at a Gigabit serial bus,..> You must be kidding. For you as a master of all sides of PC industry: even at 72 bits times 66MHz (a modest speed) you have a bandwidth of 5 Gigabits/sec, or FIVE TIMES your Gigabit serial. With clock forwarding you can do 200MHz, or 15Gb/s. Please think before you post hearsays you do not comprehend... Or better go woodworking.