Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (2214)	9/9/1998 10:02:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 67261

Please stay and ignore the attackers - thats what I do. I just "clear all messages" every morning and start anew! I am interested in your perspective - do you live here now, and if so, where. Also I have heard that in Canada they can't believe Clinton would fall over something like this. Michelle

To: one_less who wrote (2214)	9/9/1998 10:14:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I agree you should not be attacked for just being a white Muslim. If you are not a double agent and ARE a member of the Jihad against the great satan can we ask you to please live in Tehran, Kabul, Karachi or Baghdad so we can nuke the proper people when Armageddon begins? respectfully, your reluctant enemy.

To: one_less who wrote (2214)	9/10/1998 9:25:00 AM
From: j_b	Respond to of 67261

<<I joined this discussion thinking I might have something to offer from my some what unique perspective. >> You do - everyone does. Personally, I welcome the viewpoint. <<I offered some narration based on that perspective. My comments received very little attention. My character received a lot. >> Anytime you get involved in a discussion on politics or religion that happens. You combined the two - WOW! <<My comment to Lorrie was meant to be in regards to her acceptance of lying behavior>> This is where the discussion usually breaks down on this board. I don't think the people defending Clinton actually accept the behavior. It's just that the notion of their "side" losing the prestige and power is just not acceptable to them. If the cause is important enough, many people start to adopt an "ends justifies the means" mentality.