Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (4409)	9/10/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: Les H	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13994

It just shows that the only scandal for which he was caught was the one in which someone talked. There were plenty of scandals for which he and Hillary should have been prosecuted if only their partners had talked or they didn't destroy evidence. telegraph.co.uk:80/et?ac=000118613908976&rtmo=floM0Yls&atmo=floM0Yls&P4_FOLLOW_ON=/98/9/10/wcli310.html&pg=/et/98/9/10/wcli310.html

To: j g cordes who wrote (4409)	9/10/1998 9:41:00 AM
From: j_b	Respond to of 13994

<<This Starr/Clinton hide and seek is a political attack on the person of Clinton to unseat the Presidency. Get it.>> I tend to agree, but that doesn't excuse Clinton from the consequences of his actions. <<the fact that he lied about an affair and attempted to hide it is not a high crime against anyone but himself and his family, its certainly not a crime intended against the state or to defraud or use his office. >> I agree here, too. However, I don't believe that an impeachment will be based solely on this one issue. If there isn't a clear pattern of abuse of power or corruption, I doubt the general public would support impeachment, and I doubt the Republicans or the Democrats would have the cojones to pursue it without the support of the public.