SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rentech(RTK) - gas-to-liquids and cleaner fuel -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles T. Russell who wrote (8420)9/10/1998 10:32:00 AM
From: eric deaver  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14347
 
Charles,

More on topic-

Can you explain why, if RNTK is the SCAM you say it is, why TX has not come out to correct the PRs involving them. To me, that would be a very prudent step that ANY major would make without batting an eye. IMO, this is the all the proof we have that TX is still in negotiations. If you are right and it is next year when the deal is done, I frankly could care less. What is a year in this deal. More dilutions and dripping floorless will mean just all the more buying potential down the road. I would prefer a "end of summer" deal but really next year is no big deal either.

So to get back to topic - how do you refute the logic of my first statement? Would TX really take the chance of getting involved w/ shareholder lawsuits by not refuting RNTK's claim? TX silence is all the proof we need of RNTK validity.

Please respond with your thoughts.

Eric



To: Charles T. Russell who wrote (8420)9/10/1998 10:33:00 AM
From: Starduster  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14347
 
May I suggest NO more response's to Mr. Russell, then, and only then might he get the idea and finally leave us alone.

Notice he did not take on the bet that RNTK is not a scam. Since it really isn't, he might end up having to buy us all dinner at a 5 star restaurant... as the deal get's closer every day......... s



To: Charles T. Russell who wrote (8420)9/10/1998 10:35:00 AM
From: Jane4IceCream  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14347
 
Chas,

Then why do you have to keep defending yourself on SI???

Why dont we get back to discussion of RNTK.

Janebird (yawn)