Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doughboy who wrote (4428)	9/10/1998 11:02:00 AM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

<< when was it ever a defendant's duty to provide evidence to prove his innocence? >> The defendant always provides evidence to rebut the prosecution's case. Generally, that's the same effort as proving their innocence. Is it their "duty"? no, but they would be foolish to allow only one side of the issue to be presented. In this case, Clinton is merely choosing the time and place to present his evidence, and properly decided that the GJ was neither the right time nor the right place to do so.