Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BlueFox who wrote (13734)	9/10/1998 8:11:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18444

But, BlueFox, who are the former SIMers the suing? Answer: Softbank Holding and Ziff-Davis. They are not suing Zulu-tek. So why, when writing about a lawsuit directed toward Softbank Holding and Ziff-Davis, did Wired devote half the article space toward bashing Zulu? Answer: Because Wired intended to bash Zulu. So when Wired writes today and describes the problems related to Softbank Holding, why didn't it include the "related link" that the former SIMers were suing Softbank Holding? Answer: Because Wired treats this as Zulu's negative, not a Softbank Holding negative. So when Wired writes about Zulu, why does it include the suit against Softbank Holding? Answer: Because it helps make Zulu look bad. Don't you see what's happening here? Our investment is being unfairly characterized by Wired's reporting. Wired does not want Zulu to look good at all! I admit an improvement in the reporting in the last article about Zulu. But this is only because it finally gave some of Zulu's version of events. And, further, I'll remain hopeful this situation will change and that the journal will eventually become completely objective when writing future articles about Zulu. But presently, I just find it hard to believe that Wired can write about Zulu and include the former SIMer's lawsuit against Softbank Holding against Zulu; and then write about Softbank Holding and not include the former SIMer lawsuit against Softbank Holding against Softbank Holding. Don't you agree that there's something wrong with that picture?