SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (4883)9/11/1998 3:52:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Respond to of 13994
 
Sounds like Sick Willie really, really enjoys the legally accurate kind of sex, huh...... bp



To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (4883)9/11/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: RinConRon  Respond to of 13994
 
Temp, the "easy definition" referred to in an earlier post is exactly that, and will occur on election day. Watch the rats jump ship now to keep from drowning.



To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (4883)9/11/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
My narrrrrrrow mind calls lying under oath in regards to a SEX SCANDAL part of the SEX SCANDAL babe.

These guys told me there will be true corruption in the Starr report. To me, that means mathematically no relationship to sex whatsoever. Not lying under oath about sex, not having sex, not breaking some political parties view of marriage vows relative to sex, no sex nada.

If there is a logical relationship between sex and everything in the Starr report then he has nothing in my opinion, and yes I think the populus will be disgusted with this.

And regardless of what he has, I do not want to know the details of Bill and Monicas escapades in the oval office - well, wait, thats not completely honest - i dont want to get caught lying on this thread - yes I would like to know but decency tells me I shouldnt know.

So, babe, there you have it.
Michelle



To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (4883)9/11/1998 4:09:00 PM
From: Machaon  Respond to of 13994
 
<< How many times did SlickWillie lie under oath? And what would you in your narrrrrrrrrow mind call that?

After reading for 30 minutes, its take for that peasant,fartbag, scum of all scum, a-hole, most perverted "perons to ever hold an office"
>>

Your note to Michelle doesn't add credibility to your view that Clinton should be impeached. It just shows how vulgar, insulting and nasty you can be.