To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (4764 ) 9/11/1998 5:14:00 PM From: bmart Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26163
Mr. Mitchell, I won't do your diligence but will refer you to places you can find the answers. your first contention; It was you and Ms. Shell that posted , both PM & publically, that Wellrich and AZNT were having an "arbitration hearing", Ms. Shell PM'd me , quite matter-of-factly , it was last Thursday. You told us it was last Friday. Neither of you will comment on the conflict in eachother's claims. You and Ms. Shell stated you were " Procuring and scanning" documentation of a "judgement". One week later, there is still no documentation of your claims and you evade the topic. Rather you attack me for calling your bluff. Secondly, One need only call Monsanto and inquire why they pursued a joint venture with AZNT over stevia. I also offered to fax documentation to Mr. Jhild, he refused. Ms. Shell admits to having the documents, so she can concur. Next, The doctor, as I posted, only interest at this point, in TON was INFORMAL. Hospital protocol, procedures and administrative concerns prevent him from giving a PROFFESSIONAL COMMENTARY at this time. The doctor is quite excited by TON's taste and it's potential applications for pediatric diabetic patients. I was also very pleased to be the laison between the Dr. and Dr. Lorrichio. Again, I posted they WERE NOT THE SAME WEIGHT, you either performed poor DD, or you are lying with malicious intent. I focused on their structures and why one, because if the length of the carbon chain and the greater stability of multi-bonding O2's would take longer to break down or have greater "dulciness". In the end , Mr. Mitchell, I never lied. And , judging from your post that I am responding to. The littlest amount of diligence will demonstrate that it is indeed you, who is doing the "lying" here. Good Day RB _________________ The FEDERAL court is now ordering the "shorts" to return back IMMEDIATELY what they have sold in the open market. The 4.480mil shares were originally 144 shares that were sold and THESE WERE CANCELLED BY THE COMPANY. So, as a result, The shares sold in the open market, through Canada, is now considered NULL AND VOID. But, the company is asking them to be returned to the TA(transfer agent). Since the shorts sold something that is not theirs and is being asked by the FEDERAL COURT to return them IMMEDIATELY, then they just have to buy it all back from the open market and COVER their short position. Now, the DTC is on a "freeze", thats why the stock moves on literally just 1000 shares. When the freeze is lifted, the certs for ALL of the float and more will be called in. BTW, The float is being held by a friendly group of shareholders, far away from S.I., who are reliable and want this squeeze to work. THEY DON'T NEED OUR EFFORT TO BUST THE SHORTS, AS YOU PROBABLY HAVE NOTICED BY NOW. On top of that, those shares sold to us and the rest of the people buying this stock since July, were sold "naked". They should be covering for these too. That leaves you with more than just 6mil in shorts. Why? Because, the float's been eaten up already! and there are NO MORE SHARES OUT THERE! GOOD LUCK TO EVERYONE!