Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bmart who wrote (4784)	9/11/1998 5:41:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

The arbitration hearing? Sure it happened. On Thursday, as I said. You ought to realize by now that I'm nearly ALWAYS right. You could save yourself some trouble... So. Want a case number? Want the name of the arbitrator? Yes, he's from the AAA. Funny you couldn't find this stuff out all by yourself, but then maybe the Webkmaster didn't feel like letting you in on it.

To: bmart who wrote (4784)	9/11/1998 7:54:00 PM
From: WRAP_IR	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

I received an email on this company the other day and though I would check it out. WOW - what a battle. Anyway, could someone please take a moment (hype and bash is fine) and answer a couple questions? 1. Is there validity to the claim that JB Oxford was not named in the law suit? 2. What happens if Mr. Mann et al do not have the money to buy back the stock. If this is a civil case, and all the money is off shore, would AZNT simply obtain a judgement until those funds are (if ever) repatriated. 3. Why did the company issue a boatload of stock to these guys anyway? 4. If the "short squeeze: is allegedly going to take place, why would insiders file to sell, not only what is posted on Yahoo from 8-26, but this week (2 times) as well. That smells funny. 5. What is the float, outstanding, revenues and profit(loss) before and after this little mess. 5. I have seen and heard that the next "scam" is a stock dividend issuance to call in the certs. With the exception of TGSK, it has often ended in a crashing share price. It would appear that the typical "call in the certs" ploy never works without dangling the "dividend carrot" out there. When the stock is called, the price does shoot up, leving insiders a free reign to sell, while investors stock is help up at the transfer agent. Any opinions? I appreciate your time. Thanks in advance.