Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (65214)	9/12/1998 12:41:00 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 176387

<OT> Also on this issue I want to point out that there is something to be said for lying when your family and people close to you are involved. Who wants a president that is going to blurb out the gory details of his personal life, things that could hurt the people close to him, to some out of control voyeuristic prosecutor? I dont want a president like that - not condoning what Clinton did, but this "lying under oath" crowd, you seem to have no honor, remember this man was protecting people around him. MH

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (65214)	9/12/1998 9:22:00 AM
From: Stockjet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Chuzzlewit: <<...Starr's investigation. If this man had any integrity at all...he would have pulled the plug on this bedroom farce a long time ago.>> Let's see, now. The man who had a legal duty to expose wrongdoing and did his job has no integrity. Does that mean the wrongdoer is full of integrity? I don't get it. I don't read that any of this happened in a bedroom. I read that it happened in the business office of the CEO of the United States while he was on duty and conducting business of the United States with members of Congress.