Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5161)	9/12/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Are you married? Does your wife (or girlfriend) agree with that analysis? JLA

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5161)	9/12/1998 12:02:00 PM
From: Constance K. Landis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

>David, from where he stands, (and I agree with him) oral sex is not "sexual relations",< Then if it is not sexual relations what the hell, may I ask, is it??????????

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5161)	9/12/1998 12:04:00 PM
From: Bald Man from Mars	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Zeev: But the problem is, how can America let someone who does not have any moral fibers continue to lead our great country ... He might not done enough to warrant impeachment, but I am truly embarrassed by his behavior, and by continue to use the excuse of not putting pain in his family as an excuse to lie ... He should not have done any of that in the first frigging place ... He should just resign, I have lost all respect of him ... He can looked straight at the frigging camera, and said he did not have a frigging relationship with that women and he know damn well he got 10 blow jobs, what an idiot ...

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5161)	9/12/1998 12:51:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Respond to of 13994

Zeev - you're agreement with Slick that it is not "sexual relations" is alarmingly ignorant. Divorces have been granted for a lot less, and splitting hairs and parsing sentences is the cesspool of attempting to defend the indefensible. I suppose that if I were a broker and took $100,000 from you and flushed it down the toilet, that you'd accept my defense of "it was just a bad investment." Please.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5161)	9/12/1998 2:44:00 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

<<David, from where he stands, (and I agree with him) oral sex is not "sexual relations",>> That and the fondling fit the definition in the Paula Jones ruling.