Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brad Bolen who wrote (513)	9/12/1998 11:31:00 PM
From: Cymeed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1533

<<< This being the case, would it not follow that she could have/might have exaggerated the incidents of which we are so 'appalled'. >>> Good points. Given her mom is the kind of woman who specifically chooses to hang out only with rich and famous people, Lewinsky no doubt in my mind wanted those sexual things badly and in the middle of all these, might even remenber things in a wrong way, such as, the President may have not wanted her initially back in 95 and 96. But it was her persistence that caused the President eventually "evajulate" in late 96 and early 97.

To: Brad Bolen who wrote (513)	9/13/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: Melissa McAuliffe	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 1533

Oh...I believe she wanted to damage him, that's for sure. After reading that report I realized she was not some naive innocent 21 year old that was taken advantage of. She was quite the little conniver. And, in fact, had her sights set on him probably from her first day in the WH. I am not defending him by any means but there are many men I think (who don't have half the sexual needs he obvioiusly does) that might just think twice when an attractive, young woman flirts with him and goes so far as to "pull up her jacket to show him the top of her thong panties'. (Though I had to read this more than once because I kept thinking this didn't make any sense since women usually wear these under a skirt....not under their jacket<g>), It was sheer stupidity to tell all her friends about their liaisons and I can maybe write that off to maturity. But if you were supposedly in love with someone who just happened to be Pres. of U.S. would you write it all down? What reason would you have for ever thinking you would ever need to recall the exact dates, times and who he was talking to on the phone at the time. Unless you thought you might need it later. Didn't her dress get stained AFTER he had ended things with her. Guess this was just a way of being sure to have more evidence against him. If she thought he was such a creep why not throw the dress away or at least get it dry cleaned. Sorry but I just have a real problem with this woman. I actually pissed me off that he apologized to her. She didn't deserve an apology. It's funny but when I first heard about all this I felt sorry for her...figured she was a poor innocent naive 21 year old. He was the older married man....giving her a line about how his wife doesn't understand him, etc.etc. But then to find out they had 6 sexual encounters before they ever had a real conversation. Well, sorry but that says a lot about her..... I'm sure that most of what she said is true. But could some of it be exaggerated. Wouldn't put it past her at all. All I can say is if it were me and I supposedly cared for someone and didn't want to hurt them I don't think I would have found it necessary to mention the cigar, that's for sure. I mean it isn't like she was asked the question..."So, Monica, at any time during any of your "meetings" with the President was a cigar used in any unusual way?"