Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (4994)	9/13/1998 12:44:00 AM
From: bmart	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

Mr. Reece, ".......The father of the CEO received 1 million shares for $10,000 worth of consulting work, now worth close to $2 million...." The "father" was able to get AZNT the export licensure. No license, no company. RB

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (4994)	9/13/1998 10:01:00 AM
From: KCsunshine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Mr Reece - WHO ARE YOU TO TELL ME WHAT I SHOULD FEEL IS IMPORTANT? Only shouting because you did. I made the references that I did because I find your attempt to be this arena's moral conscience nothing more then a repugnant effort to improve your case. As to what I said regarding your case, please review my words and you will find nothing in error. What you have admitted to doing is enough to ensure that you have no credibility and nor right to make the insinuations you have. Sir since when are edgar filings made to reassure the public securityholders? Can you show me one example of where an edgar filing was made to that end? Is it legal to use the sec to reassure your securityholders in a filing with no other purpose? Are you completely talking from where the sun does not shine? I know the answer to the last one, but please answer the rest. Here is a solution, do not buy aznt until such a filing is made! But do not have the gall to tell me what I should require to own this security. I have my own criteria for investing in this security and for you to tell me to insist on what you feel is necessary is pathetic. You are the most presumptuous person, even superceding jhild's tactics of stating which security symbols could be discussed here. Your distrustful nature most likely stems from the fact that you and your words are not worthy of trust. Thank you for confirming that the only way for this conspiracy theorum of yours to work is by illegal acts committed on the part of aznt management. Why did you avoid that? Any past lawsuits against mr slyver have nothing to do with sec filings or preferred shares being locked up, so why would you even mention that, other then in a vain effort to lend credibility to your harebrained, illegal scheme? Is there a legal way that insider securityholders could enter four to six million secuirties into the public held float{currently eight hundred thousand to one million four hundred thousand based on different schools of thought} in the course of a week? Do not bring up gifs or any other symbol to give your scheme credibility it can not obtain on its own. Even you must see that by picking irrelevant material that sounds damaging undermines the validity of your proposed scam. If you continue this particular attack by associating aznt management with past scams, you may be guilty of defamation. You should be more careful considering your past difficulties. Again any legal way for what you propose to occur? Bests, KC